The EU’s proposed 2040 climate target falls short of scientific advice and risks weakening its climate framework. By choosing a 90% reduction—the lowest end of the advisory range—and allowing up to 3% reliance on international carbon credits, the proposal undermines ambition and raises legal and policy concerns.

International credits often fail to deliver genuine emissions cuts and are linked to human rights risks. Relying on them in place of domestic action delays systemic change, creates investment uncertainty, and reduces health and ecosystem benefits. To meet international obligations and align with the 1.5 °C limit, the EU should strengthen the target and prioritise direct domestic reductions.

Read the CEJ’s full response to the EU’s proposed 2040 target here: